Going into this study, I suspected that domain-level link metrics would not be a good predictor for mentions. I was expecting Google AI Overviews to show more of a correlation since they may use some of the traditional search signals, whereas the other systems may not. For traditional search, usually the page-level metrics are more predictive of rankings than domain-level ones.
I looked at the top 50 websites mentioned in Ahrefs Brand Radar for Google AI Overviews, ChatGPT, and Perplexity. This is across ~76.7M AI Overviews, 957k ChatGPT prompts, and 953.5k Perplexity prompts for the month of June 2025.
I compared the website mentions to their Ahrefs Rank (AR) in Ahrefs. Ahrefs Rank (AR) ranks all the websites in our database in order, by the size and quality of their followed referring domains.
Sidenote.
Brand Radar isn’t just another LLM visibility monitor, we track a large amount of queries across all of these systems and you can query for any product, service, or brand and compare vs competitors. It’s more like Site Explorer than it is Rank Tracker. Plus we have the web visibility index so that you can see how you’re talked about online and the search demand index to see how popular you are in searches.
Here’s what Brand Radar looks like.
Let’s dig in.
Perplexity shows a moderate correlation between the mentions of its most-cited domains and their Ahrefs Rank, Google AI Overviews a very weak correlation, and ChatGPT no correlation. I was expecting Google to have a stronger relationship than Perplexity, so the results surprised me.
This correlation would likely change with a larger dataset outside of just the top 50. The top 50 are all extremely well-linked and cited websites.
I’ll give the usual correlation does not equal causation disclaimer.
Here are the Spearman rank correlations for mention share vs. Ahrefs Rank across the top 50 domains in each system:
AI Assistant
Spearman Rho
P-Value
Correlation
Google AI Overviews
-0.12
0.47
Very weak
ChatGPT
0.01
0.95
No relationship
Perplexity
-0.34
0.095
Weak
Google AI Overviews over-index on UGC sites like YouTube, Reddit, and Quora, as well as encyclopedic content like Wikipedia. We’ve seen this in a few other studies already.
These sites get extra weight in mentions than their link profile predicts.
Google AI Overviews underweights on social media sites like LinkedIn, Instagram, and Facebook. Another pattern we’ve seen in other studies.
We also see a similar story with ChatGPT, where they are overweight on things like Wikipedia and news sites like Reuters, exactly like we saw before.
Perplexity also shows the same biases we’ve seen. YouTube and Wikipedia are overweight, social media sites are underweight.
Final thoughts
I’m not sure this is enough of a sample size to get a good measure. We actually saw higher correlations in Google AI Overviews compared to DR when we studied 75k sites than we saw in correlations to normal Google rankings across 1 million keywords, 0.326 vs 0.131.
We’ll run a bigger study beyond the top 50, as well as look at some more page level metrics for more insights.
https://zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/wp-header-logo-22.png25001273Team ZYThttps://www.zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ZYT-1.pngTeam ZYT2025-06-26 08:30:002025-06-25 12:14:20Domain-Level Link Metrics May Not Be Good Predictors of AI Search Mentions
A
good view from Eric Enge on how Google is improving its search result
quality with Rankbrain – its newish AI powerered algorithm.
However, and it’s a big however, 50% of new millennials don’t
use search at all – they are simply told stuff by other people – combined with
AI assistants like SIRI and Google NOW being pre-emptive. . . search may
actually be decreasing. . .
From Fast company: “A
new study offers a peek behind the scenes at how Google structures its search
results. The study focuses on how Google’s RankBrain algorithm, which was first
announced in October 2015, parses the English language. It’s one of the most
detailed efforts to understand the algorithm to date.
“Google improved in about 55% of the
queries that they didn’t understand back in July of 2015,” study author Eric
Enge told Fast Company. “Honestly, I think that’s pretty amazing.”
Enge, who works for marketing
consulting firm Stone Temple, focused on how RankBrain works compared to other
Google machine learning products. He then made inferences on RankBrain’s
behavior and results, which is something Google has not extensively discussed
publicly.
In order to conduct the study, Stone
Temple compared a sample set of 1.4 million pre-RankBrain queries to Google’s
current search engine. They then analyzed a small remnant of search queries
from the older set for which Google didn’t provide appropriate results.
After the launch of RankBrain, 54.6%
of search queries that previously returned irrelevant results began returning
appropriate results.
Some of these hard-to-resolve
searches included queries like “What is low in the army” (Where the searcher is
believed to have been searching for “what is low rank in the army”) and “Why
are PDFs so weak” (Which, in the older version, first showed PDFs with the word
“weak” rather than results about the security of PDF files). Stone Temple also
saw what appear to be improvements surrounding specific phrases like “What is,”
“Who is,” and “Where is.”
“We also found certain specific
classes of phrases they handle better,” Enge said. These certain misspellings,
such as when users misspell “Qatar” (the country) as “Cutter.”
One of the things Enge emphasized in
the report is that he believes RankBrain has a negligible effect on SEO. He
writes that it “simply (does) a better job of matching user queries with your
web pages, so you’d arguably be less dependent on having all the words from the
user query on your page.” The biggest changes from RankBrain, he added, have to
do with increasing search quality and creating a likely framework for Google to
apply further machine learning improvements to its search engine”
https://zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Nov-2019-Exploration-2-1.jpg7681024https://www.zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ZYT-1.png2023-02-12 13:40:002023-02-14 10:05:05How AI is Disrupting Google Search?
The past
decade has been a decade of dynamic disruption where a number of technologies
came forward and took the center stage. Several organizations also adopted new
age mechanisms to kick start their transformative journey. In the last few
years, digital transformation has become the core for almost all tech-based and
some not too tech-savvy organizations as well. In this digital race, to stay
ahead, they are incorporating numerous tricks and techniques not just to outdo
their contemporaries but to surpass their traditional and uninteresting mode of
business.
As we have entered into a new decade, industry along with
industry experts have started predicting how digital transformation will cause
disruption in 2020 and beyond. Here is the list of top digital transformation
trends that are more likely to shine this year.
• Consumer Experience • Analytics: A Competitive Edge • AI at the Forefront of Digital Transformation • Growing Importance of Mergers and Acquisition Activities • Relevance of APIs in Business Performance
Today’s marketing teams have to be technologically literate, data savvy, and agile
Fast moving technology and changing business models have played a part in disrupting every industry from farming to pharma, but it’s easy to overlook their impact on marketing and communications. How has the profession evolved in the face of potential disruption?
We spoke to Barbara Bates, global CEO of international communications agency Hotwire, to find out.
After growing up in Silicon Valley, working as a television reporter, and then starting a technology PR agency from scratch, Bates is not your average marketer. For 25 years, she ran PR agency, Eastwick until it was acquired by Hotwire in 2016. Following the acquisition, Bates was asked to become the global CEO. Now, she runs the company’s operations across Australia, the US, Europe, and Asia.
“We used to talk about ourselves as a technology communications firm, working with tech companies, but now we work with all different types of companies… Every company wants to be a technology company, or leverage innovation to build value around their brand. That’s something we’re really good at.”
Automating marketing Technology is oiling the wheels of marketing, and according to Bates, most marketers now recognise that disruptive technology will help rather than replace them.
“We’re at a point where people are trying to be smart about leveraging technology that will either automate, or make more efficient, some of the more commoditised parts of our business around data like gathering research and coverage tracking,” she explains. “When it comes to AI, I think people assume that it means replacing humans. Most marketers with any experience realise it’s about augmenting what humans do. It’s a way of making communications more authentic, to automate and get data from AI.”
In many ways, digitalisation has aided in building trust. And, contrary to popular belief, the influx of technology has also catalysed a movement back to the human element.
“One of the observations I’ve made is that with digital transformation and technology, the pendulum swings very far in one direction. We sort of lost the human element, especially when it comes to marketing. I definitely see a big push back towards that. You see brands talking about being more human, and how better to engage. We’re seeing them do that by building an online and offline presence.”
As an example, Bates recalls a magazine pop up event in New York where, instead of handing out purely physical or digital copies, the brand asked authors to present their articles to live audiences. Connecting offline and online experiences in this way has become a valuable tool for building genuine relationships with clients.
Shifting the operating model Marketing teams have also been affected by changing business models. One particularly important shift has been the abandonment of the agency of record (AOR) model, in which businesses rely on a single agency to handle all of their projects, PR, and marketing needs.
“Over the last five years, the big global AOR model has started to fall away,” says Bates. “Brands now purposefully want to work with a variety of agencies. Adobe, for example, works with three different communications firms that might bring different skill sets and creativity. It also means that companies are not locked into one agency and can offer project opportunities to different agencies to see different types of work.”
The willingness of big businesses to dish out project work is one of the reasons for Hotwire’s notable organic growth. Diverse competition helps smaller firms to make a bigger impact, which threatens the multinational agencies used to one-on-one contracts. Projects such as customer events, rebrands, or training programmes aren’t part of Hotwire’s regular work, but they do present an opportunity. Applying a flexible, nimble, mindset to projects enables Hotwire to work with renowned companies, and compete in a more varied market.
New challenges Bates explains, the complexity of the job today…
“To be a marketer today, you have to be really well versed in finance, data, technology, and a wide variety of disciplines. Just look at what percentage of global buying technology budget is now decided by the CMO verses the CIO or CTO. CMOs have bigger budgets than ever before. That’s one of the challenges, not just for marketers, but for agencies. You have to learn new skills as you move up in your career, and even if you’re staying at the same level, the disciplines and skill set required is expanding incredibly.”
On top of the difficult task of creating compelling, meaningful narratives, digitalisation has brought a host of new challenges. For Bates, a major problem for CMOs is the onslaught of cyber crime.
“It is the CMO’s job to protect their company’s image. If there’s a data breach, or phishing – which is a huge issue – you have to deal with that. If you’re a retail bank, let’s say, and all of a sudden your customers are getting false emails from someone who’s phishing, that has a direct impact on the bank’s brand even though they’ve done nothing wrong. That’s why marketers care a lot about cybersecurity because, more and more, it’s easy to steal a brand.”
Cybersecurity also requires marketers to invest in more training and security, which takes time and costs money. Just as CMOs have a responsibility to support cybersecurity initiatives, they have to encourage clean data culture. Suffering a cyber breach is damaging enough, but actively failing to protect client data is entirely the fault of the brand. Another challenge is hiring and retaining the right talent.
“One of the things that I spend a lot of time on is building Hotwire into the best agency you’ll ever work with, and that’s not just for clients, but for employees too. What they want is really challenging creative work, and flexibility. Everyone appreciates flexibility, not just the millennials. If you’re a working mum with an hour and a half commute, then I’d much rather you spend that hour and a half doing great client work.”
Success is simple Agencies and their employees have to contend with more data, more project work, and more competition than ever before. In the face of these demands, Bates’ key piece of advice to the marketing and communications team within any organisation is to simplify.
“There is so much noise and complication in communication and in every consumer buying decision. When you look at the companies who have really done well with their brands, they have a very simple message. I think this is a huge challenge for technology companies who still talk about lots of features and benefits.”
The first example that comes to Bates’ mind is Apple. However, she explains that a lot of the companies that have quickly gone from being little known to well known – think Deliveroo, Slack, and Uber – came up with a simple message that they told consumers over and over again.
“I know a lot of amazing companies with amazing products that just couldn’t launch because they couldn’t create their story in a way that was simple enough to capture people,” she says. “Make it simple, and learn the power of story, because that’s the way people connect.”
This message is part of Hotwire’s own brand, building the capacity to work collaboratively instead of competitively, and with flexibility rather than rigid rules, is what makes small to medium agencies stand out from the crowd.
“We’re trying to set ourselves apart by doing the best thing for the client,” says Bates. “It’s about being fluid. We’ve come from organic growth, for the most part, and Eastwick worked with a lot of startups, so we have a bit of a scrappy persona. Companies are more likely to work with mid sized agencies who have that global reach but are nimble.”
https://zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/NEW-Year-Jan2020-Exploration.jpg7681024https://www.zoomyourtraffic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/ZYT-1.png2020-01-31 12:31:352020-01-31 12:31:37Disruption leading to O2O