AI Search
It’s hard to believe, but here we be — at the start of yet another new year and metaphorical clean skillet in the ever-aromatic Android kitchen.
This year, though, our January blank slate feels less like a true blank slate and more like a continuation of the same basic themes we saw starting to shape up with Google’s mobile platform last year.
As usual, there’s more than a little ambiguity involved. And now in particular, we’re facing some pivotal questions — with some hugely consequential twists and turns on the horizon.
With the start-of-the-year dust officially settled and all the early-January hype-spewing behind us, it’s time to take a close look at what Google might have in store for us in the months ahead — both what we already know (or think we know) is coming and, equally important, what questions we need to be thinking through in order to fully understand what any of this could mean for us.
Grab the nearest thinking cap — one with a colorful propeller on top, if at all possible — and let’s dive in.
[Psst: Give yourself an early productivity boost with my free Android Notification Power-Pack — six smart enhancements that’ll change how you use your phone.]
When we last broke out our green-tinted crystal balls — way back at the start of 2025, some 77 years ago, I believe — we were thinking about Google’s then-freshly-announced plan to get away from the long-standing pattern of having a single new major Android version land toward the end of each year and shift instead toward a twice-annual platform-updating cadence.
At the time, it wasn’t entirely clear how, exactly, that might play out. Google simply said it’d send out a major Android update in the second quarter of every year, moving forward, and then a smaller Android version update in Q4 — leaving us wondering whether that Q4 update would be a full-fledged new numbered Android version, more of a 0.1-style update, or something else entirely.
Having lived through the first full run of this pattern now, we know the answer: It’s something else entirely. While it seemed like Google might be giving us two true Android versions every year in this setup, it’s actually more of a mere moving of the existing one major new version to earlier in the year — and then the bundling of that “second” update as part of the standard quarterly feature drop in December.
All signs suggest that same setup will continue in 2026, with Android 17 sometime this summer and then the smaller update to follow. And speaking of which…
Generally speaking, seeing more software updates is an unambiguously good thing from the perspective of an end user. But with Android, now in particular, there’s an asterisk — actually, two:
On that first point, consider this: ‘Twas a time, not so long ago, when we could say that some new Android version — Android 12, for instance — included a certain set of specific features. And if you had that Android version on your device, you could assume those core features would be present and available for you.
Now, when we talk about Android 16, we have to mull over which specific era of Android 16 we’re considering. There’s the original/main Android 16 release — the big update that landed back in June 2025 — but then there’s also Android 16 with the presence of any number of quarterly Android feature drops or Pixel-specific feature drops (including but not limited to that aforementioned Q4 update) that followed.
And there are some seriously significant features associated with those subsequent updates, too — like the notification summary option and automatic notification organizer system that came with the Q4 drop, for instance. Technically, that’s all connected to Android 16 — but you can’t just say “If you have Android 16, you should find this feature!” Instead, it’s “If you have Android 16 and also received the December 2025 feature drop…” — and who the hell knows if they fit into that category?! (For the record, only Google’s own Pixel gizmos have gotten it so far.)
Again: This isn’t only a once-annual complication, even. These same Android version additions are arriving every single quarter now — both for Android, on the whole, and for Pixel devices, specifically, in two separate setups.
Having all these improvements show up regularly throughout the year instead of only once in a single annual bundle is a tremendous asset and advantage for Android, to say the least — especially compared to the comparatively turtle-like pace of updates on that other mobile operating system. (And that’s to say nothing of Android’s incredibly underappreciated advantage in the way Google updates so many system-like elements via individual apps as well.)
But, my goodness, is it getting complex and cumbersome to keep track of — or even to wrap your head around at all, as an average user or Android-embracing organization. I’ve gotta think there’s a way Google could make this a little simpler in terms of how it’s organized and presented, though it doesn’t seem like 2026 is the year that’ll happen.
On the subject of confusion, the long-standing possibility of Android and ChromeOS coming together in some way is fully expected to actually move forward — on some level — sometime this year.
But how exactly that’ll play out and what it’ll actually mean for us remains a mystery.
What we now know is that Google intends to migrate its desktop-centric ChromeOS operating system to the Android stack — the underlying foundation that powers the software, in other words — sometime in 2026. That seemingly involves a new code base known, at least internally, as Aluminium OS.
And while the goal of this change is without a doubt to bring the two platforms closer together, what we still don’t know is whether it’ll result in a dramatic change in the way Chromebooks — or, potentially, even Android devices — look, work, and are presented.
For its part, Google has mostly danced around anything specific on the subject. Earlier this month, much was made over an executive’s comments that the company wasn’t “giving up on Chromebooks” and that it was laser-focused on “continuity of experience and devices, not to mention business continuity” as a part of this process.
But does that mean that current Chromebooks will continue to run their current ChromeOS software — which Google would continue to support — while newer devices run something else entirely? Will it even be called ChromeOS? Or will it be “Aluminium” — or, heck, even just “Android”?
On that note, we’re clearly seeing steps being taken toward getting Android ready for a more optimal desktop-style, large-screen experience — and we’re hearing plenty of rumblings about “Android laptops,” too. So will these next-gen “ChromeOS” devices, whatever they’re called, effectively be those “Android laptops”? (And if so, what does that say about the interface they’ll be running and its connection to ChromeOS, in its current form?) If not, is Google planning to push both Android and ChromeOS into that form factor wholeheartedly?
And, on the subject of updates: Will devices running whatever this newer version of the operating system is called continue to receive software updates at ChromeOS’s breakneck pace? Or will they be brought into the (moderately chaotic) Android update schedule instead? And who will be responsible for sending out those updates, anyway? Will it be Google, as is generally the case with Chromebooks, or will it be up to each individual device-maker, like what we see with Android?
Oof. My head hurts.
With the perspective of the past and Google’s general goals as a guide, my suspicion all along has been that this’ll be more of an under-the-hood change than any grand front-facing shake-up to the Chromebook brand and experience. But until Google tells us for sure — supposedly sometime this year — educated speculation is all we’ve got to go on.
Alongside all of that stuff, we’re actively seeing efforts around some genuinely interesting improvements to the Android interface — most of which relate in some way to creating more flexible and efficient multitasking possibilities.
Among ’em are recent and ongoing developments such as:
Let’s not forget, too, that floating pop-up windows are actually present in Android already — albeit, in ways that require third-party power-ups on many devices and the discovery of an invisible power-user shortcut on others.
All of this ties into the idea of Android working better on the big screen, but it also holds plenty of potential for the way the operating system could evolve and better serve us on phones and other types of devices, too.
On that note…
Folding phones may still seem cutting edge to the mainstream masses — but for those of us here in the land of Android, at least, they aren’t exactly novel terrain at this point. (Welcome to the party, iFolk! As usual, you’re unfashionably late. And, as usual, we’ll look forward to watching the entire world pretend like you just came up with a revolutionary new concept the likes of which no one has ever before experienced. Hoorah!)
For those of us who don’t limit our technological adventures to a single slow-moving company’s vision, what 2026 is likely to hold is more of an evolution than a revolution in phone form — with new twists on the foldable approach coming into the spotlight and some other interestingly different form options showing up for us as well.
To wit: Samsung’s three-panelled tri-fold phone — and the opposite but equally interesting Clicks Power Keyboard that turns any Android device into an old-school BlackBerry (or OG Moto Droid, if you prefer).
With regular ol’ smartphones no longer being the shiny new source of excitement they once were and even foldables feeling a little less special with every passing year, it seems safe to say 2026 will be a time when gadget-makers get weird again and start trying out wacky new concepts to see what sticks. And, regardless of whether each and every last idea ends up being right for me, personally, I am all for seeing that sort of creativity and experimentation. It’s long been a huge part of what makes Android so special and such an exciting area to follow.
Less exciting to me, personally, is the other part of the funky form focus — and that’s the already-apparent obsession with selling us all on the value of augmented-reality glasses, including the inaugural Galaxy XR Android XR headset (gesundheit!).
Look, this type of technology will no doubt be useful in certain limited and extremely specific business environments — but at a time when so many of us are actively trying to limit our interactions with technology (and when, rightfully so, lots of us are learning to approach current-gen AI systems with a healthy helping of skepticism), I’m just not sure putting Gemini directly into our vision is something scores of us are clamoring to do.
But you’d better believe we’ll be hearing a lot about it in the months to come.
Relatedly:
Yup — again: For better or at times for worse, the generative AI craze isn’t slowing down anytime soon.
And here in the Android arena, that means Gemini is almost certainly gonna be crammed into our craniums at every possible opportunity even further — and even more than we’ve seen so far.
With any luck, some of that will actually result in stuff that’s practical and reliable enough to be useful and not just somewhere between “silly parlor trick” and “it would be helpful if it didn’t confidently serve up inaccurate info 10% of the time” — as has been the case with the vast majority of AI features so far.
But, we shall see. And one way or another, it’s certainly coming. Again.
Last but not least, for one final déjà-vu-inducing moment: With all of the incoming AI fiddle-faddle, it seems increasingly clear that Google’s trying to get back to the level of predictive intelligence we veteran Android-adoring animals remember from well over a decade ago.
I’m talkin’ about the Google Now system that generated more than its share of oohs and ahhs when it launched back in 2012, only to be abandoned for no apparent reason a short while later. I’ve noted before how the more current Android Circle to Search setup is more than a little reminiscent of Google Now and its companion Now on Tap sibling. Those similarities have only continued to crop up in the time since — and now, Google is also testing a taste of that same proactive intelligence in the inbox with its experimental Google CC agent.
If Circle to Search is Now on Tap reincarnated, Google CC is very much Google Now itself in a newer form. The big question is if either system can reach the level of reliable helpfulness their prehistoric predecessors already enjoyed prior to their untimely demises. And that, I’m afraid, is something we’ll have to wait to find out.
I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: If there’s one thing I’ve learned in analyzing Google all these years, it’s that you never fully know what the company might be thinking — and there’s always room for the element of surprise.
We can rely on roadmaps, remarks, and the perspective of time to get a pretty good idea of where Google’s going, at least in broad strokes. But at the end of day, Google’s gonna Google — and no one can possibly predict what pivots, flip-flops, or random new ideas might come into the mix unexpectedly and shake up everything we think we understand.
One thing’s for sure: From positive to ponderous and exciting to exhausting, it’s gonna be a wild 12 months ahead. And, I don’t know about you, but I can’t wait to see how it all shakes out.
Why wait for Google to give you new goodies? Grant yourself useful new superpowers this second with my free Android Notification Power-Pack — six smart enhancements for any Android device in front of you.
JR Raphael is obsessed with productivity and finding clever ways to make the most of modern technology. He’s written about almost everything imaginable at some point — including even construction, crime, and climate in his past life as a TV news producer — but these days, he’s known primarily for his unmatched analysis of Google’s Android and ChromeOS platforms (both of which he’s covered closely since their starts) along with his knack for digging up off-the-beaten-path tech tips and treasures.
JR writes Computerworld’s Android Intelligence column — the internet’s longest-standing Android column and one he’s conducted since its inception way back in 2010 — along with a variety of practical pieces about business productivity. That aside, he’s the founder and editorial director of The Intelligence, where he waxes poetic with his calorie-packed Android Intelligence newsletter (a saucy sibling to the same-named CW column) as well as his cross-platform Cool Tools recommendation station. He is also a contributing editor at Fast Company and has written or been cited in everywhere from The Verge and Mental Floss to The New York Times, ABC World News, and USA Today.
(Random trivia: JR was actually quoted in Walter Isaacson’s best-selling biography of Steve Jobs — for, erm, somewhat salacious and very appropriately Android-related reasons.)
Despite his refusal to comb his hair, JR’s work has been honored with a gaggle of awards over the years — including two Emmys, three Murrows, and a smattering of top distinctions from the Associated Press. He has also received a handful of coveted Azbee Awards for standout business reporting, most recently in recognition of his in-depth exposé of Google’s business-aimed Android phone recommendations.
In his spare time, JR enjoys breathing, chewing, and staring aimlessly into space.
